Monday, December 21, 2009

Movie Review: An Education

An Education is a film completely and inexorably transported on the wings of a star-making performance from Carey Mulligan. The unparalleled grace and consistency that Mulligan brings to the role of Jenny is remarkable. She taps into the nuances and unwavering emotions of a 16-year old girl growing up in the 1960's, accomplishing it in a style reminiscent of the great Audrey Hepburn. With this kind of performance anchoring the core of the film, director Lone Scherfig and screenwriter Nick Hornby weave an elegant adaptation of the Lynn Barber memoir. Hornby's exquisite use of language to capture the development of relationships is essential to deciphering the subtle undercurrents at play in this film. An Education is not simply about Jenny's assiduous fascination with English Literature and World History, but rather her natural proclivities engaged toward the development of an intellectual lifestyle. The film serves as a commentary on the birth of modern feminism. It presents not only an England teetering on the edge of social progression, but also a girl, enervated by her romantic infatuation, who rises above her personal hardship to become a real woman. And in that sense, An Education teaches us a lesson worth remembering.

There are three relationships that Jenny has in this film, which are pivotal to understanding the maturation of her character. The first is the relationship she has with her parents. Jenny's parents in this film are meant to represent the bourgeois mentality that young teenagers were rebelling against in the early 1960's. Her father is a whale of a man; thunderously proclaiming the value of an Oxford education while championing the significance of accumulating professional connections. To watch Alfred Molina bellow throughout the course of the film is compelling to say the least. His performance is rich and evocative of a more conservative time in British history. Hornby's sharp dialogue between father and daughter guides Molina's performance throughout the film; the screenplay allows for him to offer an ingenious piece of comedic timing while also incorporating serious dramatic elements into the role of the nurturing parent. Scherfig's use of the mise-en-scene is minimal in these scenes, photographing the house with lots of dark, gray colors as if to say it hinders Jenny's exposure to the real world. Yet towards the end of the film, Scherfig's use of the close-up illustrates how Jenny's relationship with her parents is the most loving and the most authentic she has. Molina's speech outside the door is heartbreaking to listen to but certainly hits the right note in terms of tone and clarity. Jenny's parents might not be the most liberal of people, but in the end they are the most dependable because they truly want what is best for their daughter.

The second relationship involves David, who is Jenny's new boyfriend. David (played by Peter Sarsgaard) is the consummation of Jenny's deepest fantasies and serves as the antithesis to the bourgeois mentality. David is handsome, charming, funny, witty, and most importantly, older than Jenny. The latter fact is the one piece of information that discredits all of the more nobler qualities Jenny sees in David. And it is in this fact that Hornby's script is able to become more complex and profound. We can see the connection that Jenny has with David through Hornby's sparkling dialogue and the way in which Mulligan and Saarsgard feed off one another throughout. Granted I think Sarsgaard is the weak link in the film, exhibiting more creepiness than charm in his relationship with Mulligan. However, his performance is tolerable because it is augmented by the strength of Mulligan's performance. The way that Mulligan glistens and smiles whenever she's with Sarsgaard enhances the believability of the romance. We feel for her, and in turn, we feel for Sarsgaard as well. The romance is also complemented by Scherfig's colorful depiction of the luxurious apartment houses and fancy dinner parties where David woos Jenny; we see the silent pleasure attained by Jenny in listening to dynamic French music and speaking French to her contemporaries. All of these things play into Jenny's grand ideal of life and love, which is exactly what Scherfig wants us to see. Scherfig does a great job at illustrating the fantastical elements of it all, which include whirlwind shots of Paris and facial close-ups that showcase the blossoming love between Jenny and David. Scherfig and Hornby deceive the audience in a way that allows us to believe in the purity of the romance. This makes the ending of the film, while predictable, all the more affecting and worthwhile.

The final relationship is between Jenny and her teacher, Miss Stubbs (played by Olivia Williams). While these scenes are very limited, they are also very revealing of Jenny's personality. The earlier parts of the film show us a person who is clearly intelligent and who has the potential for a bright future. Yet her encounters with David show us someone who is very naive and very uninformed about the world. Jenny sacrifices all her potential for the sake of a man and very nearly loses everything. The power of this film lies in the fact that Jenny refuses to become a victim. She values her relationship with David as a continuing part of her education. She recants her notion of teachers as boring and bereft of life to move past her romantic entanglements and become a smarter person. The scenes between Mulligan and Williams are simple and straightforward. Yet they are intriguing because Jenny and Miss Stubbs are very similar characters with very similar passions. In the end, Jenny could be considered the future Miss Stubbs and much much more. In the end, she is no longer a girl but rather a free-thinking, independent woman.

And therein lies the lesson we can take from An Education, a fairly simple lesson that is unwittingly repeated in many films these days. We are imperfect creatures strolling with trepidation on a journey that frightens us to no end. And we yearn for guidance and consolation from outside sources because of a need to feel appreciated. The point of An Education is that we should trust the love of those closest to us because without that love, we cannot possibly learn from our experiences nor shed the pain of a broken heart. The spirit of the film lies in its protagonist's ability to overcome the odds. As a result, An Education is cinema where you can stand and cheer not just for the triumphs of Jenny, but also for the birth of a new starlet in Hollywood.

Lenny's Grade: A-

Thursday, December 17, 2009

2009 SAG Nominations

Here are the Screen Actors Guild Nominations for 2009

Best Ensemble

An Education
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Nine
Precious

Best Actor

Jeff Bridges = Crazy Heart
George Clooney = Up in the Air
Colin Firth = A Single Man
Morgan Freeman = Invictus
Jeremy Renner = The Hurt Locker

Best Actress

Sandra Bullock = The Blind Side
Helen Mirren = The Last Station
Carey Mulligan = An Education
Gabourey Sidibe = Precious
Meryl Streep = Julie & Julia

Best Supporting Actor

Matt Damon = Invictus
Woody Harrelson = The Messenger
Christopher Plummer = The Last Station
Stanley Tucci = The Lovely Bones
Christoph Waltz = Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actress

Penelope Cruz = Nine
Vera Farmiga = Up in the Air
Anna Kendrick = Up in the Air
Diane Kruger = Inglourious Basterds
Mo'Nique = Precious

WHAT THIS MEANS

Nothing really surprising here. The only thing that's curious is how Up in the Air received 3 nods for acting and yet did not receive one for ensemble. It could be a chink in the armor for this film but I'm not going that far yet. Also, pencil in The Hurt Locker and Inglourious Basterds as two Best Picture nominees on Oscar night. Their performance with the Screen Actors Guild has all but solidified their chances of scoring big nominations for this year's Academy Awards. Curious to see Diane Kruger nominated for Supporting Actress over Julianne Moore or Marion Cotillard. Perhaps Inglourious Basterds is much stronger than originally thought. I think the nominees in the Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor categories are the same nominees you'll see on Oscar night. Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress are still up for grabs. But for right now, consider Up in the Air, The Hurt Locker, and Inglourious Basterds definite nominees for Best Picture come Oscar night.




Tuesday, December 15, 2009

WHAT ALL OF THIS MEANS

The 2009 Oscar Season has officially begun. We have started to get a sense of what critics nationwide believe to be the year's best in film. The film that emerged as the so-called "critic's darling" over the weekend was Kathryn Bigelow's The Hurt Locker. Taking home Best Picture honors from the Boston, Los Angeles, and New York Film Critics over the weekend, The Hurt Locker has established itself as one of the frontrunners in the Best Picture Oscar race. Nominations from the American Film Institute, the Broadcast Film Critics and the Hollywood Foreign Press Association have only added to the momentum that this film has been generating over the course of the year. The Hurt Locker has taken its place alongside Up in the Air as a film that must be considered a serious contender this Oscar season.

This weekend was not a total loss for Jason Reitman's new film. Up in the Air sported the most Golden Globe nominations out of any other film this year, including nominations for George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, and Anna Kendrick in the acting categories. Clooney also managed to score a Best Actor win with the New York Film Critics' Circle as well. So it is definitely fair to say that there is a lot of love in the industry for Up in the Air so far. And I wouldn't be surprised if it keeps dominating the critics' groups and the major awards shows up until Oscar Night. As of right now, I consider Up in the Air to be the frontrunner for the Best Picture Oscar.

However, it is still too early to tell what kind of noise films like Avatar and Inglourious Basterds will make with all of their nominations. I personally think Inglourious Basterds will fall by the wayside. While it is definitely one of the best films of the year, I think it will be one of those films that scores a ton of nominations but not a lot of victories. It will be reminiscent of Martin Scorsese's Gangs of New York, a beautiful film with an A-list director and nominated for 10 Academy Awards but did not win a single one come Oscar night. Working in the favor of Tarantino and Inglourious Basterds is the fact that Christoph Waltz is winning virtually every single Best Supporting Actor award so far with the critics' groups. So it is possible that Inglourious Basterds could make a leap in the race. But don't count on it.

The film that will be interesting to watch is James Cameron's Avatar. It premiered last week and has been the talk of Hollywood ever since. They are not only calling it one of the best films of the year, but also one of the most revolutionary films of all time. They refer to it as one of the grandest cinematic accomplishments of our generation and has lived up to the hype of all its pre-release buzz. Avatar has already garnered nominations for Best Picture and Best Director with the Golden Globe and Broadcast Film Critics. It is scoring heavily in the technical categories, which it was expected to do to begin with. But now you really have to start taking this film seriously. If the reviews stay consistent throughout opening weekend, and the film starts raking in massive amounts of box-office revenue, then it is fair to say that Avatar could very well win the Best Picture Oscar for 2009. This will be very interesting to watch during the course of the Oscar season.

The films that are falling off the radar and fast are Precious, Invictus, and Nine. While Mo'Nique is cleaning up in the Best Supporting Actress category, the film did not receive enough love from the critics' groups over the weekend. It did receive Best Picture nods from the Golden Globes and the Broadcast Film Critics. And Gabourey Sidibe is getting well-deserved accolades for her performance in the movie. But I just feel that in terms of winning anything, Mo'Nique is the film's best and only shot at leaving a legacy in the history of cinema. You can tell that the industry isn't really falling head over heels for Invictus either . While Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon have received notices for their acting in the film, we can see that this film is being treated more as an actor's showcase rather than a grand piece of filmmaking. Notice its absence in the Best Picture category with the Hollywood Foreign Press. However, since everyone loves Clint Eastwood, it wasn't surprising to see his name mentioned among the five directing nominees this year. And Nine has completely fallen apart in recent weeks. The film has premiered to less-than-stellar reasons and there is now a massive amount of negative buzz surrounding it. While the film is nominated for Best Picture from the Golden Globes and the Broadcast Film Critics, one can see the lack of support for the film in that it doesn't have a lot of nominations scattered across the board. Nine has virtually nothing beyond the acting categories, except for its original song "Cinema Italiano". There is no directing nomination for Rob Marshall, which is very telling that the film hasn't lived up to expectations with the critics. I still believe the film will score well in the technical categories come Oscar time. However, I'm not sure that it will be among the ten nominees for Best Picture this year.

It's going to be a battle for the Best Actor trophy this Oscar season. Jeff Bridges vs. George Clooney. Are you up for it? The score is tied at 1 right now, with both actors scoring Golden Globe and Broadcast Film Critics nominations. If both keep taking critics' awards at a fairly even rate, this could be the toughest race to predict come Oscar night. The definite frontrunners right now in the acting categories are Christoph Waltz and Mo'Nique. Everything else is up for grabs. The same thing applies to the Best Picture and Best Director races. The Hurt Locker and Up in the Air have gotten off to great starts out of the gate. But trust me, the Oscar race has only just begun. And I have a funny feeling that Avatar is going to be a major player by the time this thing is finished. If I had to predict right now based on what I've seen...

Best Picture: Up in the Air
Best Director: Kathryn Bigelow = The Hurt Locker
Best Actor: George Clooney = Up in the Air
Best Actress: Meryl Streep = Julie & Julia
Best Supporting Actor: Christoph Waltz = Inglourious Basterds
Best Supporting Actress: Mo'Nique = Precious
Best Adapted Screenplay: Jason Reitman & Sheldon Turner = Up in the Air
Best Original Screenplay: Mark Boal = The Hurt Locker
Best Cinematography: The Hurt Locker
Best Film Editing: Avatar
Best Original Score: Avatar
Best Art Direction: Nine
Best Costume Design: Nine
Best Sound Mixing: Avatar
Best Sound Editing: Avatar
Best Visual Effects: Avatar
Best Makeup: Avatar
Best Original Song: "Cinema Italiano" = Nine
Best Animated Film: Up
Best Foreign Language Film: Un Prophete
Best Documentary: The Cove

That's all for now...stay tuned for more great stuff

2009 Golden Globe Award Nominations

Best Motion Picture (Drama)

Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Precious
Up in the Air

Best Motion Picture (Musical/Comedy)

(500) Days of Summer
The Hangover
It's Complicated
Julie & Julia
Nine

Best Actor-Motion Picture (Drama)

Jeff Bridges = Crazy Heart
George Clooney = Up in the Air
Colin Firth = A Single Man
Morgan Freeman = Invictus
Tobey Maguire = Brothers

Best Actress-Motion Picture (Drama)

Emily Blunt = The Young Victoria
Sandra Bullock = The Blind Side
Helen Mirren = The Last Station
Carey Mulligan = An Education
Gabourey Sidibe = Precious

Best Actor-Motion Picture (Musical/Comedy)

Matt Damon = The Informant!
Daniel Day-Lewis = Nine
Robert Downey Jr. = Sherlock Holmes
Joseph Gordon-Levitt = (500) Days of Summer
Michael Stuhlbarg = A Serious Man

Best Actress-Motion Picture (Musical/Comedy)

Sandra Bullock = The Proposal
Marion Cotillard = Nine
Julia Roberts = Duplicity
Meryl Streep = It's Complicated
Meryl Streep = Julie & Julia

Best Supporting Actor (Motion Picture)

Matt Damon = Invictus
Woody Harrelson = The Messenger
Christopher Plummer = The Last Station
Stanley Tucci = The Lovely Bones
Christoph Waltz = Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actress (Motion Picture)

Penelope Cruz = Nine
Vera Farmiga = Up in the Air
Anna Kendrick = Up in the Air
Mo'Nique = Precious
Julianne Moore = A Single Man

Best Director (Motion Picture)

Kathryn Bigelow = The Hurt Locker
James Cameron = Avatar
Clint Eastwood = Invictus
Jason Reitman = Up in the Air
Quentin Tarantino = Inglourious Basterds

Best Screenplay (Motion Picture)

Neil Blomkamp & Terri Tatchell = District 9
Mark Boal = The Hurt Locker
Nancy Meyers = It's Complicated
Jason Reitman & Sheldon Turner = Up in the Air
Quentin Tarantino = Inglourious Basterds

Best Original Score (Motion Picture)

Michael Giacchino = Up
Marvin Hamlisch = The Informant!
James Horner = Avatar
Abel Krozeniowski = A Single Man
Karen O. and Carter Burwell = Where the Wild Things Are

Best Original Song (Motion Picture)

"Cinema Italiano " = Nine
"I Want To Come Home" = Everybody's Fine
"I See You" = Avatar
"The Weary Kind" = Crazy Heart
"Winter" = Brothers

Best Foreign Language Film

Baria
Broken Embraces
The Maid
Un Prophete
The White Ribbon

Best Animated Film

Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs
Coraline
Fantastic Mr. Fox
The Princess and the Frog
Up





Monday, December 14, 2009

2009 Broadcast Film Critics Award Nominations

After the Oscars and the Golden Globes, this is probably the most important group of awards in terms of recognizing film. It serves as a precursor to where the Oscars might be headed with their choices of film. Its results are also used by Oscar bloggers everywhere to make their predictions both valid and accurate. So here are the Critics' Choice Award Nominations for 2009...

Best Picture

Avatar
An Education
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Invictus
Nine
Precious
A Serious Man
Up
Up in the Air

Best Director

Kathryn Bigelow = The Hurt Locker
James Cameron = Avatar
Lee Daniels = Precious
Clint Eastwood = Invictus
Jason Reitman = Up in the Air
Quentin Tarantino = Inglourious Basterds

Best Actor

Jeff Bridges = Crazy Heart
George Clooney = Up in the Air
Colin Firth = A Single Man
Morgan Freeman = Invictus
Viggo Mortensen = The Road
Jeremy Renner = The Hurt Locker

Best Actress

Emily Blunt = The Young Victoria
Sandra Bullock = The Blind Side
Carey Mulligan = An Education
Saoirse Ronan = The Lovely Bones
Gabourey Sidibe = Precious
Meryl Streep = Julie & Julia

Best Supporting Actor

Matt Damon = Invictus
Woody Harrelson = The Messenger
Christian McKay = Me And Orson Welles
Alfred Molina = An Education
Stanley Tucci = The Lovely Bones
Christoph Waltz = Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actress

Marion Cotillard = Nine
Vera Farmiga = Up in the Air
Anna Kendrick = Up in the Air
Mo'Nique = Precious
Julianne Moore = A Single Man
Samantha Morton = The Messenger

Best Adapted Screenplay

Wes Anderson & Noah Baumbach = Fantastic Mr. Fox
Neil Blomkamp & Terri Tatchell = District 9
Geoffrey Fletcher = Precious
Tom Ford & David Scearce = A Single Man
Nick Hornby = An Education
Jason Reitman & Sheldon Turner = Up in the Air

Best Original Screenplay

Mark Boal = The Hurt Locker
Joel & Ethan Coen = A Serious Man
Scott Neustadter & Michael H. Weber = (500) Days of Summer
Bob Petersen & Pete Docter = Up
Quentin Tarantino = Inglourious Basterds

Best Cinematography

Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
The Lovely Bones
Nine

Best Film Editing

Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Nine
Up in the Air

Best Score

The Informant!
The Princess and the Frog
Sherlock Holmes
Up
Where the Wild Things Are

Best Art Direction

Avatar
Inglourious Basterds
The Lovely Bones
Nine
A Single Man

Best Costume Design

Bright Star
Inglourious Basterds
Nine
Where the Wild Things Are
The Young Victoria

Best Sound

Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Nine
Star Trek

Best Visual Effects

Avatar
District 9
The Lovely Bones
Star Trek
2012

Best Makeup

Avatar
District 9
Nine
The Road
Star Trek

Best Song

"All is Love" = Where the Wild Things Are
"Almost There" = The Princess and the Frog
"Cinema Italiano" = Nine
"(I Want To) Come Home" = Everybody's Fine
"The Weary Kind" = Crazy Heart

Best Documentary Feature

Anvil
Capitalism: A Love Story
The Cove
Food, Inc.
Michael Jackson's This is It

Best Foreign Language Film

Broken Embraces
Coco Before Chanel
Red Cliff
Sin Nombre
The White Ribbon

Best Animated Feature

Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs
Coraline
Fantastic Mr. Fox
The Princess and the Frog
Up

Best Young Actor/Actress

Jae Head = The Blind Side
Bailee Madison = Brothers
Max Records = Where the Wild Things Are
Saoirse Ronan = The Lovely Bones
Kodi-Smit McPhee = The Road

Best Acting Ensemble

Inglourious Basterds
Nine
Precious
Star Trek
Up in the Air

Best Action Movie

Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Star Trek

Best Comedy

(500) Days of Summer
The Hangover
It's Complicated
The Proposal
Zombieland

NOMINATION TALLY

Inglourious Basterds = 10 nominations
Nine = 10 nominations
Avatar = 9 nominations
The Hurt Locker = 8 nominations
Up in the Air = 8 nominations
Precious = 6 nominations
The Lovely Bones = 6 nominations
District 9 = 5 nominations
Star Trek = 5 nominations
Up = 4 nominations
Where the Wild Things Are = 4 nominations
Invictus = 4 nominations
An Education = 4 nominations
A Single Man = 4 nominations










2009 New York Film Critics' Circle Award Winners

Best Film: The Hurt Locker
Best Director: Kathryn Bigelow = The Hurt Locker
Best Actor: George Clooney = Up in the Air and Fantastic Mr. Fox
Best Actress: Meryl Streep = Julie & Julia
Best Supporting Actor: Christoph Waltz = Inglourious Basterds
Best Supporting Actress: Mo'Nique = Precious
Best Screenplay: In the Loop
Best Cinematography: The White Ribbon
Best Documentary: Of Time and the City
Best Foreign Language Film: Summer Hours
Best Animated Film: Fantastic Mr. Fox
Best First Feature: Hunger


The American Film Institute's Ten Best Films of the Year

CORALINE
THE HANGOVER
THE HURT LOCKER
THE MESSENGER
PRECIOUS
A SERIOUS MAN
A SINGLE MAN
SUGAR
UP
UP IN THE AIR

2009 Los Angeles Film Critics Association Winners

Best Film: The Hurt Locker
Runner-Up: Up in the Air
Best Director: Kathryn Bigelow = The Hurt Locker
Runner-Up: Michael Haneke = The White Ribbon
Best Actor: Jeff Bridges = Crazy Heart
Runner-Up: Colin Firth = A Single Man
Best Actress: Yolande Mereau = Seraphine
Runner-Up: Carey Mulligan = An Education
Best Supporting Actor: Christoph Waltz = Inglourious Basterds
Runner-Up: Peter Capaldi = In the Loop
Best Supporting Actress: Mo'Nique = Precious
Runner-Up: Anna Kendrick = Up in the Air
Best Screenplay: Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner = Up in the Air
Runner-Up: Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannuci, Tony Roche = In the Loop
Best Animated Film: Fantastic Mr. Fox
Runner-Up: Up
Best Foreign Language Film: Summer Hours
Runner-Up: The White Ribbon
Best Cinematography: The White Ribbon
Runner-Up: The Hurt Locker
Best Musical Score: Crazy Heart
Runner-Up: Fantastic Mr. Fox
Best Production Design: District 9
Runner-Up: Avatar
Best Documentary: (TIE) The Beaches of Agnes and The Cove

2009 Boston Society of Film Critics Winners

So much has happened in the filmmaking world this past weekend. Major critics' groups across the country have either announced their nominees or their winners of 2009's best in film. I shall list the important critics' groups that announced this past weekend in consecutive posts. I will then use one more post to tell you what it all means. So without further adieu, here are the Boston Society of Film Critics winners for 2009...

Best Film: The Hurt Locker
Best Director: Kathryn Bigelow = The Hurt Locker
Best Actor: Jeremy Renner = The Hurt Locker
Best Actress: Meryl Streep = Julie & Julia
Best Supporting Actor: Christoph Waltz = Inglourious Basterds
Best Supporting Actress: Mo'Nique = Precious
Best Screenplay: Joel & Ethan Coen = A Serious Man
Best Cinematography: The Hurt Locker
Best Film Editing: The Hurt Locker
Best Documentary: The Cove
Best Foreign Language Film: Summer Hours
Best Animated Film: Up
Best New Filmmaker: Neil Blomkamp = District 9
Best Ensemble Cast: (TIE) Precious & Star Trek
Best Use of Music in a Film: Crazy Heart


Sunday, December 13, 2009

Movie Review: Fantastic Mr. Fox

Wes Anderson has always been a unique and gifted filmmaker. His films speak volumes about the flaws of human nature and our ability to feel compassion for others. Suffice it to say he has always been very sympathetic towards the exhibition of irrational tomfoolery; our desire to lead lives of fantastical whimsy and imagination. His films are able to show a great wisdom and understanding of how we dare to dream, even when we are forced to comply with the logistical impulses of a cold-hearted reality. Fantastic Mr. Fox is just another piece of what appears to be a larger puzzle that Anderson is working with. Embossed with a cunning intelligence and sly humor, the film glimmers and shines like one of Bean's signature cider jars. It is a gem of a film; one that will make you laugh til it hurts but will also shock you by how satirical and heartfelt it actually is. It takes its place as not only one of the best in Anderson's cinematic repertoire, but also one of the most delicious and intoxicating films of the year.

Mr. Fox (played by George Clooney) is the Vulpus Vulpus Man of La Mancha. He is an idealistic daredevil of a fox, launching hare-brained schemes to steal from plentiful chicken coupes. Since he is a fox, he is obviously doing what he needs to survive but is also acting to satisfy his intrepid craving for an adventure. Long ago, he made a promise to Mrs. Fox (played by Meryl Streep) that he would never steal chickens again because she was pregnant. That is to say, Mr. Fox promised he would never do anything to compromise the sanctity of the Fox family. Fast forward 12 fox years, or two human years later. Mr. Fox is now a newspaper columnist, Mrs. Fox is a landscape painter, and their son Ash is plagued by the depression of teenage angst. There is no denying that Mr. Fox loves his family. He just doesn't really like the family life. He wants that sense of purpose; the unwavering disposition that his life will be remembered. He moves his family into a new tree, going against the advice of the Badger (played by Bill Murray) and living very close to Boggis, Bunce, and Bean. These three men are the "meaniest, nastiest, ugliest farmers in the valley" according to the Badger. But they also are the premier suppliers of chickens, ducks, turkeys, and cider in the valley. This of course is very appealing to Mr. Fox; so appealing that it crosses the boundary of temptation. Mr. Fox simply cannot resist the urge to steal from Boggis, Bunce, and Bean with the Possum. He forsakes the promise he made to his wife and decides to take part in one last hurrah. Boggis, Bunce, and Bean find out about his ambitious idiosyncrasies and proceed to hunt down Mr. Fox, his entire family, and all the animals in the valley. The film transforms into a life-and-death struggle for survival as the audience fervidly listens to the pulsating harmony of the Boggis, Bunce, and Bean theme song.

Anderson is dealing in the realm of the metaphorical with this particular film. He stretches the limits of his imagination to bring us something that is both vibrant and faithful to the originality of Roald Dahl's book. The characters are endowed with human qualities, symbolizing the animal within ourselves. In playing with that, Anderson is able to inject his particular brand of humor into the story and make a film that is completely his own. The intricacies of the characters, combined with the visual style and look of the film, suggest a kind of subliminal appreciation for the outlandish and delightfully eccentric behaviors within ourselves. Yet Anderson is also commenting on the dangers of eccentricity; particularly how fatal they can be to the structural discipline of the family unit. Mr. Fox's actions almost destroy the people he loves. And the tears of sorrow that Mrs. Fox deploys are genuine and authentic because it demonstrates real fear and real anxiety. But perhaps it is Mr. Anderson who is so fearful and anxious. His films tend to reflect the ongoing dysfunction of the family unit; its inability to coalesce and thrive as a whole is a troublesome theme evident in all of Mr. Anderson's work. The relationship between Mr. Fox and Ash throughout the film is mediocre at best. Ash's cousin, Kristofferson, is Mr. Fox's ideal vision of the son he always wanted. The accomplishments of Ash are therefore considered to be obsolete and remain so until Ash sports his refined tube sock for a bandit hat near the end of the film. Anderson's concern for the perseverance of the modern family serves as a parallel thought to his observations on unorthodox behavior throughout his entire body of work. The fact that Fantastic Mr. Fox ends with family and friends dancing in a supermarket seems to indicate Anderson's longstanding optimism and faith in the converging of these two ideas ultimately leading to a greater peace of mind.

On the surface, Fantastic Mr. Fox is an eloquent piece of work. The writing is smart, crisp, and clever enough to make this animated film perhaps more enjoyable to adults than it would be for children. Some of the themes that Anderson is working with here will not be fully understood or appreciated by the impressionable minds of young children. With that being said, there are enough visual jokes and comedic subtleties to keep them occupied for the entire 87 minutes of this film. And I thoroughly enjoyed Anderson's use of stop-motion animation in the film. Not only does it give the film a more elegant visual sensibility, but it also emphasizes the motif of a puppet world. That is to say we are controlled by our own desires and subjected to our own temptations. It corresponds greatly with the themes of a Wes Anderson picture and certainly does not hinder the overall structure of the film in any way. Anderson's use of color and lighting corresponds with the way he presents his story. His direct humor and imaginative physical comedy leave the audience feeling blissful and content with the survival of Mr. Fox. In the end, the film proves to be too irresistible to ignore. Anderson's quirky fox odyssey triumphs, while Boggis, Bunce, and Bean still sit near that fox hole wondering how the hell Anderson and Mr. Fox got the best of them.

Lenny's Grade: A-























Monday, December 7, 2009

Thursday, December 3, 2009

National Board of Review Award Winners 2009

So begins the Oscar season, where critics' groups across the country announce their winners for the best in film during the year. The National Board of Review is usually the first out of the gate, giving filmgoers a premature indication of what the Oscar list may look like come February. Usually, the winners from the National Board of Review are not set in stone for Oscar wins as well. However, among the NBR's 10 nominees for best film of the year, one will usually find Oscar's golden horse buried in there somewhere. So to give you a small idea of where this year's Oscar season may be headed, I present to you the National Board of Review's best films of the year

Best Film: Up in the Air
Best Director: Clint Eastwood = Invictus
Best Actor: Morgan Freeman = Invictus, George Clooney = Up in the Air (TIE)
Best Actress: Carey Mulligan = An Education
Best Supporting Actor: Woody Harrelson = The Messenger
Best Supporting Actress: Anna Kendrick = Up in the Air
Best Adapted Screenplay: Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner = Up in the Air
Best Original Screenplay: Joel & Ethan Coen = A Serious Man
Best Foreign Film: A Prophet
Best Documentary: The Cove
Best Animated Feature: Up
Best Ensemble Cast: It's Complicated

National Board of Review's Ten Best Films (they actually listed 11)

An Education
(500) Days of Summer
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Invictus
The Messenger
A Serious Man
Star Trek
Up
Up in the Air
Where the Wild Things Are

WHAT THIS MEANS:

This is very good news for Up in the Air. This Best Film win from the National Board of Review, along with 3 other wins for acting and writing, solidifies the film as one of the frontrunners this Oscar season. The same can be said of Invictus, which took home honors for Clint Eastwood's direction and Morgan Freeman's performance. Some things to notice from the NBR's Top Ten List (or 11) are the absences of Nine and Precious. Nine is supposedly one of the big films to see this holiday season. With a star-studded cast and a A-list director attached to the project, this is a film that has Oscar written all over it. Strange to see it left off the list. But it is even weirder to see Precious shut out of major honors, especially for the performances of Gabourey Sidibe and Mo'Nique. I have not seen Up in the Air or An Education yet to compare performances, but as of right now Sidibe and Mo'Nique have given the two best performances of the year. And the fact that Precious is left off the NBR's list for best film is outrageous because it is truly a very powerful and very well-made effort. However, I still think Precious will be there in the end. The power of Oprah and Tyler Perry combined is too great to cast aside what is a truly amazing film. I am not surprised by the absences of Avatar or The Lovely Bones on the list. No one has seen Avatar yet so it's impossible to put it on any best film list as of right now. And The Lovely Bones has been getting mixed reviews since it debuted in London, which means that critics simply don't know what to make of it. I applaud the appearances of (500) Days of Summer, Inglourious Basterds, Star Trek, Up, and Where the Wild Things Are on the list because it indicates a more audience-friendly selection rather than a conceited elitist perception from film historians and the like. The NBR is but the smallest of precursors to the Oscars. Lists will change over time as studios begin to launch their campaigns for the films they think could win come Oscar time. But for right now, the National Board of Review has spoken. And Up in the Air is the best of the year.

Anna-Kendrick-and-George-Clooney-in-Up-in-the-Air.jpg










Monday, November 30, 2009

Top 5 Films of the Holiday Season


I thought I would try something new here and give my opinion as to what I think are the Top 5 films to see this holiday season. While New Moon and The Blind Side are simple and conventional choices for the modern moviegoer, the greatest thing about the cinema is its ability to transcend beyond the realm of entertainment. Moviegoers are able to build their sense of awareness and heighten their own perception by choosing films that replenish the mind as well as the heart. All the best movies are released during the Christmas season in order to achieve greater Oscar consideration. And for moviegoers yearning for some kind of connection and feeling with the movies they see, it certainly is the most wonderful time of the year. Without further adieu, I present to you the Top 5 films to see this holiday season.

#5 Up in the Air

Up in the Air is the new film from Jason Reitman, the Oscar-nominated director of Thank You for Smoking and Juno. And in case you couldn't tell, it also stars George Clooney. Clooney plays a guy whose job is to fly all over the country and layoff people for top-tier companies. Along the way, he is set up with a partner (played by Anna Kendrick) and also encounters a woman (played by Vera Farmiga) whom he may or may not be interested in. What Reitman explores with this film is the power and necessity of forming close relationships, particularly how we choose to give ourselves to someone both physically and emotionally and how we establish connections in order to ensure a thriving legacy. Sounds like a handful, right? But what makes Reitman a good filmmaker is his ability to balance a heartfelt drama with subtle comedic timing. And in my opinion, Reitman is well on his way to becoming the next Billy Wilder or Frank Capra simply because he is such a great storyteller. This is a film that will play well to audiences and will most likely be recognized come Oscar night.

#4 Invictus

zz12e4f4d8.jpg


Clint Eastwood's latest film about the 1995 South African rugby team that won the World Cup. Starring Morgan Freeman and Matt Damon, Eastwood tells the story of how Nelson Mandela collaborated with Francois Pienaar in order to bring South Africa together after the apartheid era. This probably won't be as dark as some of Eastwood's most recent work but expect strong performances from Freeman (who I think is perfectly cast as Nelson Mandela) and Damon in a film that appears destined for Oscar glory. Eastwood has been the director of the decade. Let's see if his hot streak continues.

#3 The Lovely Bones

TLB090324_FINAL_STLLS00007_t.jpg image by jncorp

Peter Jackson's adaptation of the best-selling novel by Alice Sebold. Look for something that is visually stunning and emotionally captivating much in the same way that Jackson's last four efforts have been. The Lord of the Rings trilogy and King Kong were certainly four of the best films of the decade visually. But the thing that made those films successful was how there were characters through which the audience could develop a strong emotional attachment with. Look for the same kind of angle with The Lovely Bones. Jackson will not only hope to give us an awe-inspiring visual effort, but will also look to tug at the heartstrings a little bit. Early buzz indicates that there are strong performances from Saoirse Ronan and Stanley Tucci as the film's main protagonists. There are also indications that the film is impressive visually, which doesn't surprise me at all. I expect nothing less than a great piece of entertainment with this film.

#2 Nine

11728161_gal.jpg


A new musical from Rob Marshall, the Oscar-nominated director of Chicago. A film that pays tribute to the neorealist cinema of the 1960's and Italian director Federico Fellini. Featuring an all-star cast in Daniel Day-Lewis, Nicole Kidman, Penelope Cruz, Marion Cotillard, Kate Hudson, Fergie, and Sophia Loren. I mean, come on now. Need I say more to make you want to see this film? Nine tells the story of Guido Contini, a renowned film director who is having trouble coming up with a story for his latest picture. Contini turns to the many women in his life for inspiration, looking to find a solution to the creative block in his mind and make a film worthy of recognition. The film is actually autobiographical because it is based on the life of Federico Fellini so it is indeed a must-see for any true cinephile. Expect a visually lush film from Rob Marshall; something that will certainly dazzle the eyes if nothing else. And expect many many Oscar nods as well.


#1 Avatar

avatar_samworthington-500x280.jpg


A sci-fi epic from Oscar-winning director James Cameron, who hasn't made a feature length film in 12 years. Avatar is a film that Cameron has been developing for a very long time. He had the screenplay ready to go before Titanic was released in 1997 and intended to make Avatar as his follow-up film. However, Cameron decided to shelve the project until cinematic technology caught up with his own ambitions. It is now 12 years later, and the world is waiting for what Cameron has come up with. Avatar was shot using 40% live action and 60% CGI, with Cameron inventing new kinds of 3D technology that will apparently revolutionize the film industry forever. That's right, you have to wear the funky glasses if you want to get the most out of Cameron's latest adventure. The key to the film's success will be if the story can match the visual innovations that Cameron has created. On a recent 60 minutes interview, Cameron asserted that the story is still the most important component in creating a film. This of course led him to talking about the 3D technology he developed for Avatar, which leaves me to wonder if indeed the story will be the most important component for this film. There is so much hype and excitement surrounding this film that it's not even funny. And I'm hoping that Cameron delivers once more like he has always done in the past.

So there you have it, my Top 5 films that everyone should see this holiday season. I hope you look for them in a theater near you.




Sunday, November 29, 2009

Movie Review: Precious Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire

How often do we approach life with perspective? How often do we recognize the truth about the world we live in? We the people are ignorant of the world around us. We see images and hear whispers of pain and suffering every day. But how do we respond to them? How do we learn from them? The answer to both those questions revolves around the idea of empathy. We feel compassion for the suffering and shed tears for the wounded. We curse the violence and bemoan the hatred involved in acts of cruelty. But do we ourselves feel compelled to make a difference? Do we search our hearts for the motivation to change someone's life? There are many of us who do not. But there are some of us who do; relying on their hope, their faith, and their love to somehow impact the world in whatever way they can. Lee Daniels' new film Precious, based on the novel 'Push' by Sapphire, is a film that captures the essence of pain and suffering. It is a film that grabs hold of you and smacks you across the face with a bitter sense of reality. But it is also a film of great hope and empathy; a film of raw and intense passion that examines its title character from a unique and totally engrossing perspective.

Daniels forces his audience to see the truth and not look away, daring us to become part of Precious's world and achieve a knowledge of America's wicked societal underbelly. He thrusts his audience into a world that is both cruel and hazardous to the development of a young girl's confidence and self-respect. Precious is an overweight African-American 16 year old living in the slums of Harlem, New York in the 1980's. She was raped by her father on multiple occasions, bore his child who has Downs Syndrome, and is pregnant with his second child when the film begins. She is also living with a mother embittered by jealousy and hatred, both of which she uses against Precious whenever she feels like it. She is the ultimate mother from Hell and there are many sequences in the film where Precious cannot escape her wrath. So the world that Precious is accustomed to is a world of unmerciful and relentless struggle. Her future has already been laid out, with virtually little to no hope of escape. So how does she cope with it? By fantasizing about skinny white models with incredibly sexy boyfriends who strut down that runway believing they're God's gift to humanity. This is what she thinks about when she gets abused by her mother or raped by her father. And for certain periods in the film, it is the only thing she has. What Daniels is commenting on with these fantasy sequences is how America has developed an ideal standard of living, which involves being skinny and being attractive. The fact that Precious dreams of being white is understandable because they still represent the majority of the privileged and elite in this country. These fantasies, combined with the physical and emotional torture of abuse, prevent Precious from seeing the potential in herself as a human being. That is until she encounters Ms. Rain and Mrs. Weiss.

It is in these scenes with Ms. Rain and Mrs. Weiss that the film derives its emotional power punch. For the first time in her life, Precious meets two people who seem to care about her emotionally. She meets two people who go above and beyond their job description in order to save her from herself and from the nightmare that is her life. There are moments in this film where Precious is finally able to see her potential as a human being; where she is able to express herself by writing in her journal and by having relationships that are loving and authentic. Yet the film's strength is showing how those moments are compromised; how Precious's mother is so terrifying and unnatural to her daughter that one wonders how Precious is able to last so long. She lasts because she holds on to the idea that there are people in her life who care about her and love her. And in the end, the story becomes a triumph of the human spirit because Precious is able to transcend beyond the cruelty of her parents and move on with her life.

Precious is a film that is unflinching and uncompromising. It shows you things you may not want to see and is certainly not for the faint at heart. It speaks volumes to us because it is not simply a story of an overweight African-American girl. It is a story that so many Americans, regardless of their skin color, can relate to. Audiences should not merely relegate this as a story of black poverty and differences in social classes. Rather, it must be studied as an examination of a human soul. And on that merit alone, Precious is able to succeed on so many levels. The anchor of the film lies in rich performances from Gabourey Sidibe as Precious and Mo'Nique as Precious's mother. In order for the film to be as powerful as it is, both of these actresses needed to nail their characters out of the park. And both of them do so in a big way. Sidibe is electrifying as Precious, highlighting her character's vulnerability and insecurity while also paving the way for her own self-discovery. It is a daring and dynamic performance that is richly deserving of an Oscar nomination for Best Actress. And Mo'Nique is incendiary as Precious's mother. Through her use of language and body movement, Mo'Nique creates a portrait of a monster eating away at Precious throughout the course of the movie. It is only in the final 30 minutes of the film that Mo'Nique allows us to understand the depth and complexity of her character, begging the audience for sympathy but never receiving it. It is definitely one of the great performances of the year and should be recognized come Oscar night. The performances of Sidibe and Mo'Nique are interchangeable. One cannot work without the other in order for the film to succeed. And because both actresses deliver on all counts, Precious becomes cinema that is truly precious.

Lenny's Grade: A-



Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Movie Review: A Serious Man

We are all very serious men and women. We contemplate our lives; every choice we make, every decision. And we always wonder what the consequences of making that choice will be down the road. We wonder about what purpose it serves and what meaning it will have in the grand scheme of things. We may all say that we are not serious men and women, but we really are. We want that sense of finality; that sense of resolution and knowing the truth about ourselves. That way, our lives will seem to go by a lot easier because we will have all the answers and know where our lives will go eventually. This part of ourselves is what the Coen Brothers have chosen to explore in their new film A Serious Man, the story of a Jewish professor (played by Michael Stuhlbarg) beset with all kinds of dilemmas both of a personal and professional nature. But by no means is A Serious Man a serious drama. It is indeed the most personal film the Coen Brothers have ever made because for the first time ever, the audience is able to gain insight into the world these famous directors grew up with. And what they present to the audience is not only a black comedic study of what it was like living in a Jewish suburban home during the 1960's, but also a thorough examination of how the Jewish community attempts to interpret the meaning of life and the consequences of making choices.

There are two terrific bookend scenes that start and conclude the film which I think summarize the evolution of Jewish thought regarding the meaning of life, or at least how the Coens interpret said Jewish thought. The beginning of the movie takes place inside a Jewish peasant house and is spoken entirely in Yiddish. The writing in this sequence is almost Tarantino-esque as the dialogue keeps building up towards the arrival of a strange visitor who may or may not be a demonic spirit coming to cause trouble for the Jewish husband and wife. When the visitor arrives, the conversation shifts to the notion of hospitality and how the wife is very suspicious of the visitor being a demonic spirit so much so that she stabs him with a knife. Nothing happens at first, which leads us to believe that the visitor is really a ghost of some sort. But then blood slowly trickles from his chest, to which he then stands up and walks out of the house ranting in Yiddish of how inhospitable the family was so much so that he puts a curse on them. The scene ends with the man and wife concluding that because they had eliminated the evil spirit, their lives would greatly improve from now on. I think this scene represents the kind of ancient Jewish rhetoric that used to be a source of tradition and custom in many Jewish families. It illustrates the idea of how Jewish families believed in the presence of good and evil spirits along with the idea of hospitality and following ritual to the letter of the law. If they did that successfully, then life would be much easier without any reason for worry. And this is what the Coens seem to be mocking throughout the course of the film, which is why it serves as a terrific beginning to what is meant to be both an allegorical and autobiographical film.

Fast forward many years to Larry Gopnik (the Jewish professor) and what we have here is the Coens offering a loose adaptation of the Book of Job. I say loose because it really is an adaptation of the Book of Job with the original sentiments of a Coen screenplay. Gopnik is a man who seems to have everything; a wonderful job, a beautiful family, a nice house. He has everything much like Job did in the Bible. And then one day God, or in this case the Coens, decide to take everything away from poor Mr. Gopnik. It begins when an Asian student seemingly offers Gopnik a bribe in order to get a passing grade. Gopnik calls him out on it, the Asian student says he didn't do it so he sues Gopnik for character defamation. It only gets better for the professor. His wife falls in love with Sy Adleman, the nicest and gentlest man in the neighborhood. As a result, she asks him for a divorce and even asks him to move to a local motel so Sy could move into the house. Not to mention he has the wonderful Uncle Arthur (played by Richard Kind) inventing his explanation for the universe and always taking a little too much time in the bathroom. So basically the Coens have everything unravel for the Jewish professor, which leads him to go searching for answers from various rabbis and always leaving feeling unsatisfied. But with Sy Adleman telling him how everything is going to be fine, Gopnik should really have nothing to worry about.

And in essence, that is the point of the entire film. The Coens are arguing that we cannot possibly know all the answers to everything in life. So what do we do? We look to what God told Job in the Bible. "Who then is he that can stand before me? Who has given to me, that I should repay him? Whatever is under the whole heaven is mine." A literal translation...we cannot know everything that God knows. Everything that happens happens because God wants it to happen. And therefore, the key to happiness in life is to accept the way God has made things and to not question what it all means or why things are the way they are. The Coens' response to that....still why? And this is what affects the character of Larry Gopnik throughout the course of the film. The performance of Michael Stuhlbarg is one of great tension and fear; so great at highlighting the insecurities of the character to the point where making a choice is very uncomfortable for him. The cinematography of Roger Deakins is full of Dutch angles and slanted high-angle shots that make the film seem like a horror movie. The writing of the Coens is so full of not only comedic intelligence but also a profound understanding of the Jewish lifestyle. In fact, they are keen to point out that the easiest way for Jews to cope with their lives is through their sense of humor, their bluntness, and their vast ability to attempt to find the quickest solution to the most complicated of problems. This is what Gopnik attempts to do throughout the entire film. He tries to find a physical answer to why his life sucks. And the answer is so simple that he cannot see it. He is blinded to it and this is what seems to trouble the Coens immensely not just with this film but within their entire body of work. This film allows for all the nihilism and existentialism in their other films to now be judged from a new perspective, which is one of silent anger and vast confusion. The ending of A Serious Man is so rich and complex but it is also so simple. We want to know what happens to Larry. We want to know what happens when the tornado hits at the end of the film. Yes, there is a tornado! And we want to know these things in the same way we wanted to know if Tony Soprano lived or died. But the twisted joke involved is indicated in the abrupt ending of the film. We always want to know why. But the key to happiness is not knowing why. The Coens seem dissatisfied with this conclusion, as I'm sure most people will be by the ending of the film. But...what can you do? As Sy Adleman says in the film, everything is going to be fine.

Lenny's Grade: A






Sunday, November 15, 2009

Movie Review: Disney's A Christmas Carol

For those of you who have read Charles Dickens's classic Christmas fable, did you ever imagine Ebenezer Scrooge soaring through the streets of London at rapid paces; snow assailing his gruff, miserly exterior and shouting "BAA HUMBUG!!!!" at the top of his lungs? Could you envision the Ghost of Christmas Past transforming into a magical rocket and slingshotting Scrooge all the way to the moon? Or how about Scrooge shrinking at the presence of the Ghost of Christmas Yet-to-Come and getting chased by a band of fierce demonic stallions? If you did imagine all of this, then you would have something in common with Oscar-winner Robert Zemeckis.

Mr. Zemeckis, lately famous for his 3-D renditions of The Polar Express and Beowulf, has once again dabbled in the 3-D pool to bring you a fascinating adaptation of the Dickens classic. At first, I was hesitant going into Disney's A Christmas Carol because the trailers and ads for the film depicted it as a children's movie, choosing to focus more on the comedic elements of the film and making it seem like an abbreviated caricature of the Dickens tale. I was pleasantly surprised by how serious Zemeckis was taking the story and not shying away from the ignorance and overall malcontent of the Scrooge character. I was also pleasantly surprised by how Jim Carrey doesn't really overplay Scrooge at all in the film. His trademark sense of exaggeration and bodily oomph are rarely seen and Carrey does a fine job of subduing himself a bit in order to provide a capable performance. Yet even though the performance is capable enough, I was not particularly astounded by Carrey's performance either. Certainly we are able to buy Scrooge's hatred for the entire Christmas season along with his greed and reluctance to accept redemption at the hands of the Ghosts. But when it comes time for Scrooge to feel sorrow and fill his heart with a desire to seek redemption, then Carrey's performance and the film in general begin to suffer.

When Zemeckis set out to make this film, I think there were only 2 ways in which he could have successfully brought the Scrooge tale to the screen. He could have chosen to make a film that focused primarily on the themes that inhabit the story, particularly in Scrooge's redemptive struggle for self-discovery through his empathy for the Cratchit family. This would have allowed for a greater emotional connection with the characters and would have provided Zemeckis with a chance at a masterpiece. What he does create though is something that in the end can be argued as the best Scrooge film ever made visually. What Zemeckis manages to accomplish with his experiments in 3-D is something that is on the brink of being masterful. There are scenes in this film that will just take your breath away visually, particularly the Ghost of Christmas Past depicted as an everlasting flame, the use of the long tracking shot for Scrooge's past, and the high angle shots looking into the hardwood floors of Scrooge's apartment that magically transform into the streets of London and a depiction of the present. These scenes allow for the film to take on a dark, melancholic tone that is only perfected by the death of the Ghost of Christmas Present transcending into the appearance of the Ghost of Christmas Yet-to-Come, a monstrous shadowy figure that terrifies Scrooge into miniaturization. Zemeckis is oh so close to something with his 3D experiments and still needs to work on character faces before we can say he is a genius. But he is so very close as this Christmas Carol proves to be the most spectacular adaptation of the classic tale ever put to the screen.

But while the film is an accomplished piece of work visually, there just isn't enough of an emotional connection to the story or to the characters. Carrey's performance suffers because in the end, there isn't enough heart that we can recognize in dear old Uncle Scrooge. His redemptive feelings seem forced and disingenuous, and even though Carrey tries to convey a man who has seen the error of his ways, his performance as Ebenezer Scrooge is missing something. It is missing that ferocity, that vivacity. It is missing a kind of empathy and sense of forgiveness. And I think that is what the entire film is missing as well. It just doesn't have that sense of hope and Christmas cheer that so many other Scrooge films seem to have because what Zemeckis has sacrificed in the name of 3D innovation are the parts of the story that are supposed to touch your heart. And while Zemeckis has created something that is so visually enthralling, Disney's A Christmas Carol is perhaps the saddest, most emotionally distant Christmas movie I have ever seen.

Lenny's Grade: B


Friday, November 6, 2009

Movie Review: Where the Wild Things Are

Few screen adaptations of children's books have ever translated so well on screen as Maurice Sendak's Where the Wild Things Are. Spike Jonze, the Oscar-nominated director of Being John Malkovich and Adaptation, brings Sendak's delightfully weird world to breathtaking and innovative life, enhancing the themes imperative to the book and expanding on the ideas that make the book so special. For those who are unfamiliar with the book (and I'd be surprised if you weren't), the story involves a young boy named Max, who is filled with all kinds of emotions and appears incapable of stabilizing and controlling them. The world around him is constantly changing with the dating habits of his mother and the maturation of his sister into a young woman. He learns new facts everyday that he finds both shocking and frightening to listen to because they threaten the balance of his daily routines. One night, he snaps at his mother for not paying enough attention to him and consequently, he runs away from home (without any supper of course). Strolling along a local river bank, he finds a boat and torridly sails to the land of the Wild Things. What he finds there are creatures that are similar to himself emotionally and this of course allows him to generate empathy for them. However, when they decide they want to eat him, he takes control and tells them that he traveled there to be their king. As a result, Max is made king of the Wild Things and is expected to make life easier for everyone there. Of course, he runs into trouble and finds that trying to make everyone happy is harder than it looks.

I said before that Jonze is successfully able to enhance the themes of Sendak's book by expanding on the ideas that are hinted at in the book. For instance, Jonze focuses on the idea that the land of the Wild Things is in fact a sad and lonely place. The Wild Things are indeed wild and uncontrollable creatures. They feed off their emotions, desiring to find happiness without ever really finding it. They work together with one another, wanting to love and wanting to believe that Max is indeed the answer to all their problems. One particular Wild Thing named Carol is a firm believer in this idea. He needs Max to be the answer to all his problems because he has no control over his emotions. He wants attention, he wants other people to love him, and yet he is unwilling to compromise to any of the other Wild Things. Carol wants things to be a certain way in his life and he reacts very harshly when he feels that others betray his dream. What I love about this movie is how incredibly well Jonze focuses on the parallels between Carol and Max. Carol is a representation of Max and how much both want things to happen their own way. In fact, Jonze plays with the idea that all of the Wild Things are a representation of the important people in Max's life. K.W., another Wild Thing who is trying to find answers about her own life, and who is seemingly the love interest of Carol in this movie, is meant to represent Max's mother in the land of the Wild Things. And Jonze develops the Freudian idea of how a young's boy first real love interest is in fact their mother. K.W. looks after Max, perhaps keenly aware that he is not really a king and quietly guiding Max throughout his time with the Wild Things. K.W.'s friends, Bob and Terry, represent the love interest of the mother in the film because Carol reacts so harshly when K.W. brings them back. So here you have all of these metaphoric characters just working themselves into Max's world. And slowly but surely, Max is able to realize the important things in his life and how things will not always happen the way he wants them to. And I think what both Max and the Wild Things learn at the end of the movie is to cherish the people who care about you in your life and to love them just as much as they love you. That is how Jonze is able to transcend beyond the words of Sendak's book. He is able to make a serious adult film out of a children's story, which I think is very remarkable.

Jonze utilizes the technical aspects of the story incredibly well. The shaky cinematography brings realism to the story and enhances the uncontrollable emotions that Max is trying to deal with in his life. He takes Max's thoughts and ideas very seriously and never dismisses them as childish, which is what I think makes this film so admirable. The vibrant and energetic musical score works on so many levels and is able to showcase the many different layers of both Max and the Wild Things. When Max is interacting with the Wild Things, the score becomes fast-paced and upbeat, illustrating how life just keeps rolling along without ever seeming to slow down. However, when Max is dealing with the emotions of the Wild Things and is actually forced to be a king, the score slows down and becomes melancholic in nature, illustrating how life can sometimes be frustrating and all the problems we have can seem too overwhelming. There is just so much working in this movie that all you can do is just sit back and appreciate it. It is a film that works because it is able to speak to all audiences and does not undermine the imagination of a child. The final shot between Max and his mother speaks volume to the entire point of the film, which is that we should care about the people who love us and never take them for granted.

Lenny's Grade: A-


Friday, October 23, 2009

Welcome

Welcome to Cinephiles and Melomaniacs: the exclusive blog that hopefully will be co-authored by Lenny Ginise and Michael Pettinari should Mr. Pettinari choose to accept my invitation for him to write on this blog. In case you are unfamiliar with the terms used in the naming of this blog, a cinephile refers to one who has an extraordinary passion for film and a melomaniac refers to one who has an extraordinary passion for music. A long time ago, Mr. Pettinari and myself decided that it would be a great idea to write a blog together so as to combine our love for film and music all into one bold and ambitious piece of kick-ass commentary. Mr. Pettinari would take on the reins of writing about music whereas I would tackle the expanding realm of cinema. I would like to think that our goal with this blog is to not only further our desire to pursue careers in writing about film and music, but to also engage and educate you, dear readers, about the worlds of cinema and music. As I said above, I hope Mr. Pettinari accepts my invitation in the coming days so that both of us can get started on this right away and also so Mr. Pettinari himself can welcome you himself. In the mean time, stay tuned because there is certainly more to come later on.